Why Are Stents Still Used When They Offer No Real Benefits?

Why Men Should Care About Consent in Pelvic Exams on Unconscious Women

Update A Controversial Medical Practice: Pelvic Exams Without Consent In recent discussions surrounding medical ethics, a haunting truth has emerged: the practice of performing pelvic exams on unconscious women without their consent is still occurring in some medical institutions. Reports have highlighted that medical students, during their training, often perform these exams on anesthetized patients as an educational tool — a norm that many in the medical community have come to accept, despite significant ethical concerns. The History of Unconsented Exams This practice, which dates back to the late 1800s, garnered widespread attention in the early 2000s when surveys indicated that a staggering number of medical students admitted to performing such exams on patients who were not fully aware, or did not consent to the procedure. Notably, a 2003 study revealed that up to 90% of medical students within certain programs engaged in this practice. Fast forward to 2025, and we still encounter a significant backlash, raising immediate questions about patient rights and medical ethics. Understanding Consent in Medical Training The concept of informed consent is central to healthcare practices globally, and yet it remains an ongoing issue within medical training, particularly in the realm of sensitive examinations. As highlighted by medical ethicists, the aim should always be to safeguard patient dignity while also providing educational opportunities for medical students. The recent guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandates that explicit consent must be obtained for these invasive procedures, which marks a progressive step towards addressing this longstanding issue. The Response from the Medical Community Despite calls for change, resistance remains from some segments within the medical community. Arguments center around the need for practical training, with some educators suggesting that restricting access to such exams could impede the education of future physicians. However, advocates argue that prioritizing consent is non-negotiable and that the potential trauma inflicted by such practices far outweighs the benefits of merely practicing medical techniques. Shifting Public Perception and Advocacy Add to this the #MeToo movement and increased public scrutiny around consent in all areas of life. This climate has stimulated broader discussions about trust and ethics in medicine. Advocates, including medical students like Alexandra Fontaine, are now pushing for concrete changes, seeking legislative measures that will guarantee patient rights and ensure that all medical procedures, especially invasive ones, are conducted with clear and explicit consent. Moving Forward: A Call to Action As this dialogue continues, it is imperative for communities, particularly those affected by historical injustices within medical practice, to engage and advocate for systemic reforms. Enhanced transparency, respect for patient autonomy, and a commitment to ethical practices should drive the future of medical training. Moving forward, it is time for the medical community to overhaul the education around consent and redefine what responsible medical training looks like in practice. Given the cultural and systemic complexities involved, we must all play a role in holding the medical profession accountable for respecting patient rights. The conversation isn’t just about the exams themselves; it’s about fostering a culture where informed consent becomes a non-negotiable standard, protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring dignity in medical practices. Conclusion: Why Knowing This Matters Understanding the importance of consent in medical practices is crucial not only for patients but also for professionals and society at large. Advocating for ethical medical training leads to better healthcare outcomes and fosters trust between medical professionals and the communities they serve. As men, whether we're in medical fields or simply individuals concerned with health rights, recognizing these issues makes for a more informed public and ultimately promotes the health and well-being of everyone.